CostFunctionBack to Blog
Token Pricing and Cost Optimization Strategies for LLMs: Practical Steps to Cut AI Spend

Token Pricing and Cost Optimization Strategies for LLMs: Practical Steps to Cut AI Spend

P
Priya Patel
··
token-pricingcost-optimizationllm

Former ML engineer at a major tech company. Now writes about practical AI implementation strategies.

Token pricing and cost optimization strategies for LLMs: measure token use, pick the right model, cache and compress context, batch requests — cut AI costs 50% or more.

Stop overspending on prompts: why token pricing matters now

Token pricing and cost optimization strategies are no longer academic exercises — they determine whether an LLM feature scales or bankrupts a project. Many teams discover this the hard way: a few high-throughput endpoints or verbose prompts can inflate a monthly bill overnight. The good news: you can take practical, measurable steps to reduce token spend while preserving user experience.

"A 10x difference in model output token price turns thoughtful engineering into immediate cost savings."

Understand the economics: a concrete example

Start with reality. In 2025, leading models charge by token with input tokens often much cheaper than outputs — for example, GPT-5 is priced around $1.25 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. That asymmetry should change how you design prompts and output length.

Quick cost math

Use a simple cost formula to estimate spend:

cost = (input_tokens * input_price_per_token) + (output_tokens * output_price_per_token)

And here is a small JavaScript helper you can paste into a console:

function estimateCost(inputTokens, outputTokens, inputPricePerM=1.25, outputPricePerM=10) {
  const perInput = inputPricePerM/1e6;
  const perOutput = outputPricePerM/1e6;
  return (inputTokens*perInput + outputTokens*perOutput);
}

// Example:
// estimateCost(500, 250) => cost per request in USD

Example scenario: 1,000 daily requests, each 500 input tokens and 250 output tokens.

  • Per-request cost: 500*($1.25/1e6) + 250*($10/1e6) = $0.003125
  • Daily cost: $3.125; monthly (~30 days): $93.75

Tiny engineering changes can move that number dramatically.

Four high-impact strategies

Across teams and providers, four strategies consistently deliver the largest returns: prompt engineering, caching, model selection, and batching. Below are practical tactics and trade-offs for each.

1. Prompt engineering and prompt compression

Be deliberate about what you send to the model. Concise prompts and context pruning reduce input tokens and often output length because the model has clearer instructions.

  • Trim boilerplate: Move stable instructions to a cached prefix or system role instead of sending them every request.
  • Use templates: Fill only the variable slots each request; keep the rest server-side.
  • Prefer structured inputs: JSON or key-value formats let the model infer less and produce shorter outputs.

Impact: practical studies show prompt compression and pruning cut token usage by 40–50% in many apps.

2. Cache context and responses

Caching reduces both input and output tokens by reusing computed context or returning stored outputs for repeated requests.

  • Prefix caching: Providers often cache repeated prompt prefixes and charge cached portions at a reduced rate. If 60% of requests share a prefix, those tokens become far cheaper.
  • Response caching: For deterministic or slightly variable workloads (e.g., FAQ answers or templated emails), store model outputs and reuse them until data changes.
  • Partial cache: Cache embeddings or extracted entities so you only send deltas to the model.

Trade-off: caching increases complexity (invalidations, staleness), but can reduce spend by 30–60% in many systems.

3. Smart model selection

Not every job needs the largest, most expensive model. Use the cheapest model that meets your quality threshold.

  • Classify, extract, or summarize? Try smaller models first (e.g., GPT-3.5/Haiku-class models). They are often 10–20x cheaper and good enough.
  • Progressive refinement: Run a lightweight model to filter or pre-process, and call a stronger model only for ambiguous or high-value items.
  • Consider provider tiers: Some providers offer specialized low-cost models for high-volume workloads.

Trade-off: smaller models may make more mistakes; build fallback verification for critical paths.

4. Batch processing and asynchronous workflows

When real-time responses are unnecessary, batch requests to reduce overhead and leverage lower-cost batch APIs.

  • Bulk inference: Send large batches during off-peak windows — batch APIs can be substantially cheaper per token.
  • Queue + worker model: Aggregate small requests into a single prompt that the model can handle in one pass.
  • Result post-processing: Decompose batch responses and cache results for quick reuse.

Trade-off: higher latency; suitable for analytics, nightly jobs, or non-interactive features.

Putting strategies together: a practical optimization plan

Optimization is iterative. Here is a short, practical playbook you can apply in days, not months.

  1. Baseline measurement: Log token counts per request (input vs output). Count frequent prefixes and repeated responses.
  2. Quick wins: Move static instructions to a server-side prefix, trim verbose prompts, and enable response caching for repeatable queries.
  3. Model audit: Replace high-cost calls with lighter models where acceptable. Use A/B testing to measure quality delta.
  4. Introduce batching and background workers for non-real-time flows.
  5. Measure & iterate: Track cost per user or per feature. Set budgets and alarms.

Example outcome: teams routinely cut LLM costs 30–50% with prompt optimization and caching alone; comprehensive implementations frequently achieve 60–80% reductions, and in niche cases up to 90%.

Real-world scenarios and trade-offs

Customer support assistant

Use a small model to classify and extract intent, then conditionally call a larger model for long-form replies only when ambiguity is high. Cache canned responses and maintain a short user-history context to keep outputs coherent.

High-volume email generation

Pre-generate templates in batch overnight and personalize them with minimal tokens at send time. This shifts most expensive output tokens to batch runs where per-token pricing can be lower.

Interactive code assistant

Invest in a powerful model for reasoning-intensive requests but limit output token budget and provide code scaffolding from the client to reduce the model's lexical load.

Actionable takeaways

  • Measure token breakdown per endpoint before optimizing; you can't improve what you don't measure.
  • Prioritize prompt compression and caching — they are the highest ROI for most apps.
  • Pick the right model for the job and use progressive refinement to avoid unnecessary heavy calls.
  • Batch non-real-time workloads and leverage provider batch APIs when available.
  • Automate alerts for sudden token-usage spikes to catch regressions early.

"Measure first, then optimize — small token savings at scale compound into massive monthly reductions."

Conclusion — a pragmatic challenge

Token pricing has turned LLM systems from purely product problems into operational and cost-design problems. The good news: the levers are practical, quantifiable, and accessible to engineering teams. Start by measuring token use, then apply prompt compression, caching, model selection, and batching in prioritized order. Even modest changes can halve your spend; disciplined optimization can do far more.

Call to action: audit a single high-volume endpoint this week. Measure input vs output tokens, try a compressed prompt and a cheaper model, and compare costs. The results will guide the next optimizations.

View All Posts